幸运快三

幸运快三 - I Banner
A student works at a computer

SlateConnect

U of I's web-based retention and advising tool provides an efficient way to guide and support students on their road to graduation.

2700 - Student Feedback on Teaching Effectiveness

Owner:

  • Position: Vice Provost Academic Initiatives
  • Email: provost@uidaho.edu

Last updated: July 01, 2024

CONTENTS:

A. Purpose
B. Scope
C. Policy
D. Procedure

A. PURPOSE. Student feedback on teaching has two divergent purposes. First, student feedback assists individual instructors in improving course design, delivery, assessment, and expectations (“instructor,” as used in this section, refers to any teaching member of the faculty or staff, including graduate teaching assistants). Second, student feedback assists academic administrators in counseling instructors about their teaching and the feedback is carefully weighed as a factor in evaluating the teaching component in tenure, promotion, and salary determinations.

B. SCOPE. This policy applies to all instructors and students at the 幸运快三.

C. POLICY. All students will have the opportunity to evaluate each of their instructors in all sections of all courses during every academic term.

D. PROCEDURE

D-1. The Office of the Provost is responsible for oversight of the administration of the feedback process, except for feedback in the College of Law and the WWAMI Regional Medical Education Program, which will be administered by those programs.

D-2. Standard university forms for anonymous mid-term formative feedback (D-3) and end-of-semester feedback (D-4), as approved by the faculty, will be used by all instructors in all of their classes, except in the College of Law and the WWAMI Regional Medical Education Program, which will use evaluative devices tailored to their needs. The student evaluation summary referred to in FSH 3500 D-2 c shall comprise the questions denoted by an asterisk in form D-4.

D-3. Mid-term formative feedback on teaching may take place during the three-week period centered on the mid-term week of the academic term or the proportion thereof for courses of less than a semester duration. The feedback will be made available to faculty two weeks after mid-terms to encourage student input for faculty seeking to improve teaching. The data generated through the mid-term formative evaluation process shall be for evaluative use by the faculty member. The data are not considered part of the faculty member's record and are not to be used in any evaluation of the faculty member, unless included in the record at the discretion of the faculty member.

D-4. End-of-term feedback on teaching shall take place during the last three weeks of the academic term (excluding final exam week) or the proportion thereof for courses of less than a semester duration.

D-5. All student feedback on teaching will be provided to the instructor, irrespective of response rates or class size (excluding courses where only a single student is enrolled).

D-6. The Office of the Provost shall see that a database is maintained of end-of-term feedback for at least the last five academic years. The data shall be made available to colleges and academic units as needed, and the numerical summaries of an instructor’s end-of-term feedback shall be made available to students or other members of the university community upon request.

D-7. The Office of the Provost, in conjunction with the University Teaching Committee,